As well made as I found The Deep Blue Sea, I’m amazed that
it took ninety-four minutes to say what could easily have been said in as little
as fifteen or twenty. Adapted from the stage play by Terence Rattigan, it tells
the incredibly simple story of a woman who leaves behind a secure but sexless
marriage for a passionate but reckless affair. With neither relationship able to
give her all of what she wants, she must make a choice between going on living
or dying alone. Plot wise, there really is nothing more to the film than that. I
have not seen or read the original play, although on the basis of what I’ve read
about it, it seems like one of the characters, an ex-doctor, had a much more
prominent role than he had in the film. I can’t help but wonder if his inclusion
would have made the story seem more substantive and less dragged out.
Taking place in London just after World War II (an opening title card gives
us the vague timeline of “around 1950”), the central character is a woman named
Hester Collyer (Rachel Weisz), whose story is told as a combination of flashback
sequences and present moments, the latter of which unfold over the course of
roughly one day. At the start, she attempts suicide by downing several aspirins
and letting her apartment flood with gas fumes from the furnace. She’s rescued
in time. Left alone to reflect, we get glimpses of the events leading up to her
attempt. She was married to an older, well-respected High Court judge named
William (Simon Russell Beale). Despite his wealth, his status, and his highly
proper behavior, Hester fell out of love with him for his lack of infatuation.

She soon begins an affair with a seemingly high-spirited former RAF pilot
named Freddie Page (Tom Hiddleston). At last, she finds the physical passion she
so desired. William soon catches on, and although he never raises his voice or
his hand to her, he decrees that he will never grant her a divorce. Hester moves
into Freddie’s inner city apartment, which is an obvious step down from the
upscale luxury of William’s estate. What started off so well between Hester and
Freddie soon begins to decline. Despite the physical attention he gives her, it
doesn’t seem he’s capable of financial or emotional stability. He forgets
important events, like Hester’s birthday. He isn’t as cultured as she is, a fact
she finds bothersome. It also seems he hasn’t been truly happy since the war
ended, and so he drinks in excess.
William will reappear several times throughout the film. After the initial
shock of learning of her affair, he finds he’s much more willing to give her the
divorce she wants. All the same, he’s genuinely baffled by her rejection of him.
Perhaps he wasn’t as physically inclined as Freddie, but did feel genuine
affection for Hester. He still does. Why is this not enough for her? She tries
to explain it to him, although it comes off as little more than excuse-making –
which is to say, she makes everything sound much more complicated than it
actually is. This isn’t to say that emotions aren’t complicated, because they
very much are, especially in matters of love. However, every conversation she
has with William is an exercise in padded dialogue. If she would just trim away
the fat and make her point, things would go much more smoothly.
Despite her verbal predilections, the film does feature some exquisitely
written passages. The best are reserved for two scenes between Hester and
William’s puritanical mother (Barbara Jefford). I will not quote any specific
lines for want of you hearing them firsthand. Just know this: Mrs. Collyer
repeatedly makes it clear, in her own prim and proper way, that Hester does
absolutely nothing right and is not good enough for her son. There’s also one
great scene with the ex-doctor, whose name escapes me at the moment; when he
checks on Hester after her suicide attempt, he delivers to William a zinger so
deliciously witty that he could have easily been quoting Oscar Wilde.
Perhaps it’s because of the story’s innate simplicity that it speaks so
fluently in the language of melodrama. One of the most noticeable elements is
Samuel Barber’s “Violin Concerto, Op. 14” (the film does not contain original
score material). Here is a piece of music that oozes solemnity from every pore,
sounding more like tonal weeping than like an orchestral piece. Long, slow solo
sections are played vibrato at the high end of the scale; they’re so
strategically placed that they’re obviously intended to represent Hester’s
emotional state. There’s no rule stating that movies like The Deep Blue
Sea need to be complicated or multilayered in order to work. All the
same, filmmakers should give you more of a reason to see something apart from an
easily understood relationship problem.

|