|
|
|
|
Boring, unoriginal, and nonsensical; has plenty in the way of atmosphere but virtually nothing in the way of plot, character development, theme, or insight.
The final act, while visually engaging, is a maddening collection of twists and revelations that clarify absolutely nothing. The last scene in particular seems intentionally constructed to make as little sense as possible – and you should know that the trailer spoils it for you regardless. How could this have become such a mess? What movie did anyone involved believe they were making? It might have helped if the filmmakers had used the plot the ads falsely allude to. “Paranormal events are a product of the human mind,” says a small section on the homepage of the film’s website, “and ghosts only exist because we believe in them.” This is an intriguing idea, and it certainly would have been worth exploring. Apart from not being the film it was advertized to be, The Apparition is boring, unoriginal, and nonsensical.
|
|
| Release: | August 24, 2012 |
| Rating: | PG-13 |
| Studio: | Warner Bros. Pictures |
|
|
Written by Chris Pandolfi (editor-at-large)
The ads for The Apparition tell us it’s about how believing
in supernatural events can make them real. The finished film, on the other hand,
never once says anything about belief or non-belief. There’s only a lot of
generic talk about summoning some dark, evil force from “the other side.”
Already, we have a huge problem, namely that people will pay to see a film
founded on a premise conjured up by a studio marketing department rather than by
the filmmakers. Did they know their movie was being so grossly misrepresented,
that the prominent tagline, “Once you believe, you die,” does not factor into
the storyline as they conceived it? This is the most infuriating display of
bait-and-switch advertizing since Case 39, the long-delayed supernatural
thriller about a demonic little girl in the care of Renée Zellweger.
But suppose The Apparition hadn’t relied on a deceptive ad campaign, that its
actual premise had been used to entice audiences. What then? Not much, I’m
afraid. Here is a horror movie so narratively tepid, so stylistically
derivative, and so conceptually vague that one wonders if it began with anything
resembling a screenplay. It has plenty in the way of atmosphere but virtually
nothing in the way of plot, character development, theme, or insight. The
thrills, while technically competent, are mediocre at best, all drawn from the
likes of other, more original, and in most cases more successful horror films.
This means that, nine times out of ten, we can see a scare coming long before it
finally arrives. Unfortunately, this level of predictability doesn’t extend to
the overall story, which doesn’t even try to be understandable.

We open with Super 8 footage of a paranormal experiment conducted in the
1970s, when a group of people sitting around a table somehow summoned an entity
from “the other side.” This manifestation, known as The Charles Experiment, was
successfully recreated decades later by a group of college students, who had an
arsenal of high tech equipment at their disposal. We see their efforts courtesy
of their own home video footage; rest assured, the Queasy Cam is utilized, and
there’s a lot of screaming in the darkness. Flash forward to what I assume is
the present day. We meet a young couple, veterinarian-in-training Kelly (Ashley
Greene) and tech-company service rep Ben (Sebastian Stan). They begin noticing
strange things happening in their new house, such as doors open by themselves
without tripping the burglar alarm, lights flickering, mysterious thuds, and
large patches of mold growing spontaneously in odd places.
And so continue these Paranormal Activity-inspired events until Kelly
discovers Ben’s connection to the recreated college experiment, which resulted
in the disappearance of one of the participants. It’s obvious that some kind of
supernatural entity is haunting Kelly and Ben. But what is it exactly? Here
enters a British parapsychology student named Patrick (Tom Felton), a geeky
typecast whose role is to provide the lead characters – and vicariously, the
audience – with technobabble explanations of a wild, paranormal nature. The more
he explains, the less sense the situation makes; this entity, whatever it is,
operates under rules so random and confusing that no potential audience is
likely to make heads or tails of it. We know that a doorway to the other side
was opened, that it wants to exist in our world, that it lives off of our fears,
that it wants to kill people, and that, at least in one instance, it can take
the form of the missing participant. But why? What does any of this mean?
Yet again, I turn my attention back to Paranormal Activity, which worked so
well because nothing was explained. How is it possible that The Apparition fails
for the exact same reason? The answer is simple: Unlike Paranormal Activity,
which was much more psychologically driven, The Apparition is completely story
driven, and therefore is required to be clear in its intentions. One cannot make
a movie on merely an idea. It must first be honed into something comprehensible,
something an audience can actually navigate through. Watching this movie is not
at all unlike playing a game without knowing what the rules are; as you struggle
to make sense of your surroundings, you’re open to attacks from the opposing
team.
The final act, while visually engaging, is a maddening collection of twists
and revelations that clarify absolutely nothing. The last scene in particular
seems intentionally constructed to make as little sense as possible – and you
should know that the trailer spoils it for you regardless. How could this have
become such a mess? What movie did anyone involved believe they were making? It
might have helped if the filmmakers had used the plot the ads falsely allude to.
“Paranormal events are a product of the human mind,” says a small section on the
homepage of the film’s website, “and ghosts only exist because we believe in
them.” This is an intriguing idea, and it certainly would have been worth
exploring. Apart from not being the film it was advertized to be, The
Apparition is boring, unoriginal, and nonsensical.

|
|
|
|
Chan and Wilson's undeniable chemistry help make the Shanghai films two of the better action-comedies of the past decade.
|
| May 20, 2013Read More! |
|
|
Like its 2009 predecessor, J.J. Abrams reduces Gene Roddenberry's once exciting and idealistic vision to the level of meaningless summer popcorn thrills.
|
| May 17, 2013Read More! |
|
|
Under Luhrmann's direction, Fitzgerald's novel is freed from the weight of its literariness; there's an energy that has never been seen before, a vibrancy, a sense that we’re actually being told a story.
|
| May 11, 2013Read More! |
|
|
While light on content, this Kaijudo starter DVD makes a good place for curious new fans to get acquainted with the hit animated series.
|
| May 10, 2013Read More! |
|
|
A nice collection of Nickelodeon's popular shows starring recognizable friends and well-intentioned lessons for preschool viewers and their parents.
|
| May 10, 2013Read More! |
See More From Movies...
|
|
We chat with Viviane Schwarz, author + illustrator of the dazzling new graphic novel The Sleepwalkers. All Ages Welcome.
|
| May 9, 2013Read More! |
|
|
Beautifully illustrated in both style and substance; rewards those who give in to its infectious sense of optimism in discovering one’s own place in the world.
|
| May 8, 2013Read More! |
|
|
We chat with the multi-talented author and artist of Calling Dr. Laura: A Graphic Memoir about life, love, and following your dreams.
|
| April 26, 2013Read More! |
|
|
We chat with author Ted Kosmatka about his latest novel, Prophet of Bones, what it’s like working for Valve, and writing intelligent fiction.
|
| April 26, 2013Read More! |
|
|
Sedaris' latest collection of essays is as good as they’ve ever, filled with the same observational humor and honesty that's helped endear him to so many.
|
| April 26, 2013Read More! |
See More From Culture...
|
|
Microsoft reveals their next-gen entertainment platform: the Xbox One. But can this all-in-one device live up to its name (and lofty goals)?
|
| May 21, 2013Read More! |
|
|
April sales rained down 42% hardware and 17% software losses YOY, with total dollars spent down a gloomy 25% overall.
|
| May 17, 2013Read More! |
|
|
A slapdash collection of the same pitfalls seen in the original game, choosing to bask in gimmickry and momentum from fans rather than creating a stable and engrossing experience.
|
| May 15, 2013Read More! |
|
|
A more accessible experience for those who might have struggled with the first two games, and a considerable improvement over the original release.
|
| May 3, 2013Read More! |
|
|
In no way perfect, but still an excellent entry to the world of DC Universe as well as an exciting fighting game with fan favorites and a narrative to keep players engaged.
|
| April 26, 2013Read More! |
See More From Games...
|